One of the biggest things that sold me on Dynascape originally was its ability to make smooth, good looking curves. The color software is a good addition as well. I've found to be more accurate with take-offs and estimating with Dynascape. There is a lot steeper learning curve with DS over Pro Landscape, but once you get used to it, you will put out much, much higher quality drawings on Dynascape in relatively the same amount of time it would take on Pro Landscape. I have used both, and currently use Dynascape. Line weights and types are used widely where as other programs don't have the same library to choose from so plan view drawings don't pop as much.įor the Professional aspect that Dynscape Provides it is well worth the extra money in my mind. The Plan quality is also much better in terms of essential design principals then say ProLandscapes (at least when I last checked). I don't see this is a big factor because usually 3d are more conceptual anyway and so small details or layout changes after the main design is establish aren't really all that important.ĭynscape is also very powerful in the Quote and Manage side if you choose to link it for quoting and drawing up contracts.
#DYNASCAPE QUOTE UPDATE#
The only real advantage to DS 3D is that when you make changes in DS design you can instantly update the 3D drawing.
#DYNASCAPE QUOTE FOR FREE#
With a little effort use can use the Sketch up for free and produce just as good of results. I don't use the 3D aspect of dynascape because once again its not worth the money to me. I will say it is quite expensive and you do have to pay each year to keep it updated, and if you don't pay then next time (say 3 years later) you want to update they are going to back charge you for the years you missed anyway. I was introduced to it during my schooling for Landscape Designer and it is definitely a good program. I have used Dynascape for 3 years now and I love it.
0 kommentar(er)
